Course disputée .
Le classement du week-end toutes compétitions confondues.
Rang | Joueur | Pronostic |
🥇 +1▲ | louisou | 44 points 1. Nathan Watson (17) 2. Eero Remes (16) 3. Daniel McCanney (11) |
🥈 +5▲ | hedihu | 43 points 1. Nathan Watson (17) 2. Jamie McCanney (10) 3. Eero Remes (16) |
🥉 +2▲ | LeChe35 | 42 points 1. Nathan Watson (17) 2. Eero Remes (16) 3. Pascal Rauchenecker (15) |
4 +5▲ | cevennol | 40 points 1. Nathan Watson (17) 2. Eero Remes (16) 3. Jamie McCanney (10) |
5 +3▲ | Lav | 40 points 1. Nathan Watson (17) 2. Eero Remes (16) 3. Jamie McCanney (10) |
6 +2▲ | tips | 40 points 1. Nathan Watson (17) 2. Eero Remes (16) 3. Jamie McCanney (10) |
7 | ptirossi24 | 40 points 1. Nathan Watson (17) 2. Eero Remes (16) 3. Jamie McCanney (10) |
8 +1▲ | carat | 36 points 1. Eero Remes (16) 2. Nathan Watson (17) 3. Daniel McCanney (11) |
9 +2▲ | Greg125 | 36 points 1. Eero Remes (16) 2. Nathan Watson (17) 3. Daniel McCanney (11) |
10 +2▲ | gbe05 | 36 points 1. Eero Remes (16) 2. Nathan Watson (17) 3. Daniel McCanney (11) |
11 +2▲ | jenj | 36 points 1. Eero Remes (16) 2. Nathan Watson (17) 3. Daniel McCanney (11) |
12 +1▲ | nofoott50 | 36 points 1. Eero Remes (16) 2. Nathan Watson (17) 3. Daniel McCanney (11) |
13 −2▼ | JMi | 36 points 1. Eero Remes (16) 2. Nathan Watson (17) 3. Daniel McCanney (11) |
14 +2▲ | jasmine | 34 points 1. Eero Remes (16) 2. Nathan Watson (17) 3. Pascal Rauchenecker (15) |
15 | Tm | 34 points 1. Eero Remes (16) 2. Nathan Watson (17) 3. Pascal Rauchenecker (15) |
16 −2▼ | jujutoto | 34 points 1. Eero Remes (16) 2. Nathan Watson (17) 3. Pascal Rauchenecker (15) |
17 −1▼ | Nistic | 32 points 1. Eero Remes (16) 2. Jamie McCanney (10) 3. Daniel McCanney (11) |
18 +2▲ | cazin | 32 points 1. Anthony Boissière (4) 2. Daniel McCanney (11) 3. Eero Remes (16) |
19 | Mouette | 32 points 1. Eero Remes (16) 2. Nathan Watson (17) 3. Jamie McCanney (10) |
20 −3▼ | Taz83340 | 32 points 1. Eero Remes (16) 2. Nathan Watson (17) 3. Jamie McCanney (10) |
21 −4▼ | NIOBE49 | 32 points 1. Eero Remes (16) 2. Nathan Watson (17) 3. Jamie McCanney (10) |
22 | pat42 | 32 points 1. Eero Remes (16) 2. Nathan Watson (17) 3. Jamie McCanney (10) |
23 −4▼ | joebar83 | 31 points 1. Eero Remes (16) 2. Daniel McCanney (11) 3. Ivan Cervantes (5) |
24 +2▲ | ben29 | 28 points 1. Eero Remes (16) 2. Nathan Watson (17) 3. Victor Guerrero (6) |
25 −1▼ | yannthomas | 28 points 1. Eero Remes (16) 2. Nathan Watson (17) 3. Victor Guerrero (6) |
26 +2▲ | yenmimi | 24 points 1. Anthony Boissière (4) 2. Eero Remes (16) 3. Daniel McCanney (11) |
27 −7▼ | desmolo | 22 points 1. Eero Remes (16) 2. Jamie McCanney (10) 3. Ivan Cervantes (5) |
28 | dess72 | 16 points 1. Eero Remes (16) 2. Victor Guerrero (6) 3. Anthony Boissière (4) |
29 | loris46 | 15 points 1. Anthony Boissière (4) 2. Eero Remes (16) 3. Rudy Moroni (12) |
💥 +2▲ | solene74 | 12 points 1. Anthony Boissière (4) 2. Eero Remes (16) 3. Gianluca Martini (9) |
Ordre fonction du nombre de points marqués puis de l'ancienneté du pronostic.