Course disputée .
Le classement du week-end toutes compétitions confondues.
Rang | Joueur | Pronostic |
🥇 +5▲ | JMi | 52 points 1. Gautier Paulin (21) 2. Maximilian Nagl (12) 3. Antonio Cairoli (222) |
🥈 | LeChe35 | 44 points 1. Gautier Paulin (21) 2. Antonio Cairoli (222) 3. Maximilian Nagl (12) |
🥉 +2▲ | desmolo | 42 points 1. Gautier Paulin (21) 2. Antonio Cairoli (222) 3. Kevin Strijbos (22) |
4 +1▲ | louisou | 42 points 1. Gautier Paulin (21) 2. Antonio Cairoli (222) 3. Kevin Strijbos (22) |
5 +2▲ | pat42 | 41 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Maximilian Nagl (12) 3. Gautier Paulin (21) |
6 | guildel | 41 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Maximilian Nagl (12) 3. Gautier Paulin (21) |
7 +1▲ | yannthomas | 41 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Maximilian Nagl (12) 3. Gautier Paulin (21) |
8 +1▲ | Taz83340 | 41 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Maximilian Nagl (12) 3. Gautier Paulin (21) |
9 | joebar83 | 41 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Maximilian Nagl (12) 3. Gautier Paulin (21) |
10 +1▲ | ptirossi24 | 41 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Maximilian Nagl (12) 3. Gautier Paulin (21) |
11 +1▲ | Cuissedamour | 40 points 1. Gautier Paulin (21) 2. Antonio Cairoli (222) 3. Jeremy van Horebeek (89) |
12 +1▲ | cevennol | 40 points 1. Gautier Paulin (21) 2. Jeremy van Horebeek (89) 3. Maximilian Nagl (12) |
13 +2▲ | NIOBE49 | 40 points 1. Gautier Paulin (21) 2. Antonio Cairoli (222) 3. Jeremy van Horebeek (89) |
14 | funset | 36 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Gautier Paulin (21) 3. Maximilian Nagl (12) |
15 | Greg125 | 36 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Gautier Paulin (21) 3. Maximilian Nagl (12) |
16 | gbe05 | 34 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Gautier Paulin (21) 3. Kevin Strijbos (22) |
17 +2▲ | pinkie | 34 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Kevin Strijbos (22) 3. Gautier Paulin (21) |
18 +1▲ | mbm | 34 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Gautier Paulin (21) 3. Kevin Strijbos (22) |
19 | Patrick42 | 34 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Kevin Strijbos (22) 3. Gautier Paulin (21) |
20 | zrx1100 | 32 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Gautier Paulin (21) 3. Jeremy van Horebeek (89) |
21 +1▲ | jujutoto | 32 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Gautier Paulin (21) 3. Jeremy van Horebeek (89) |
22 +1▲ | nofoott50 | 32 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Gautier Paulin (21) 3. Jeremy van Horebeek (89) |
23 −1▼ | carat | 30 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Jeremy van Horebeek (89) 3. Kevin Strijbos (22) |
24 | yaya85 | 30 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Gautier Paulin (21) 3. Tommy Searle (100) |
25 | jenj | 30 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Jeremy van Horebeek (89) 3. Kevin Strijbos (22) |
26 | ppda | 30 points 1. Kevin Strijbos (22) 2. Jeremy van Horebeek (89) 3. Maximilian Nagl (12) |
27 −2▼ | Tm | 27 points 1. Maximilian Nagl (12) 2. Gautier Paulin (21) 3. Steven Frossard (183) |
28 −2▼ | jasmine | 27 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Gautier Paulin (21) 3. Steven Frossard (183) |
29 | hedihu | 27 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Gautier Paulin (21) 3. Steven Frossard (183) |
30 | loris46 | 27 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Gautier Paulin (21) 3. Steven Frossard (183) |
31 | cazin | 27 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Gautier Paulin (21) 3. Steven Frossard (183) |
32 | laco-27 | 25 points 1. Kevin Strijbos (22) 2. Antonio Cairoli (222) 3. Steven Frossard (183) |
33 −3▼ | MaxBIAGGI3 | 24 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Gautier Paulin (21) 3. Ken de Dycker (9) |
34 −1▼ | ben29 | 24 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Gautier Paulin (21) 3. Clement Desalle (25) |
35 −1▼ | WHiteSoul | 24 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Gautier Paulin (21) 3. Clement Desalle (25) |
36 | solene74 | 24 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Gautier Paulin (21) 3. Ken de Dycker (9) |
37 −1▼ | Lav | 20 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Ken de Dycker (9) 3. Jeremy van Horebeek (89) |
38 −1▼ | dess72 | 20 points 1. Clement Desalle (25) 2. Jeremy van Horebeek (89) 3. Maximilian Nagl (12) |
💥 −2▼ | yenmimi | 20 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Clement Desalle (25) 3. Jeremy van Horebeek (89) |
Ordre fonction du nombre de points marqués puis de l'ancienneté du pronostic.