Course disputée .
Le classement du week-end toutes compétitions confondues.
Rang | Joueur | Pronostic |
🥇 | joebar83 | 35 points 1. Tim Gajser (243) 2. Maximilian Nagl (12) 3. Jeremy Van Horebeek (89) |
🥈 +3▲ | hedihu | 30 points 1. Tim Gajser (243) 2. Jeremy Van Horebeek (89) 3. Maximilian Nagl (12) |
🥉 +2▲ | tips | 30 points 1. Tim Gajser (243) 2. Jeremy Van Horebeek (89) 3. Kevin Strijbos (22) |
4 | Mouette | 26 points 1. Clement Desalle (25) 2. Tim Gajser (243) 3. Antonio Cairoli (222) |
5 +1▲ | funset | 26 points 1. Tim Gajser (243) 2. Shaun Simpson (24) 3. Kevin Strijbos (22) |
6 | louisou | 25 points 1. Tim Gajser (243) 2. Maximilian Nagl (12) 3. Romain Febvre (461) |
7 | jasmine | 23 points 1. Tim Gajser (243) 2. Antonio Cairoli (222) 3. Clement Desalle (25) |
8 | Taz83340 | 23 points 1. Clement Desalle (25) 2. Tim Gajser (243) 3. Maximilian Nagl (12) |
9 +1▲ | jenj | 21 points 1. Tim Gajser (243) 2. Clement Desalle (25) 3. Jeremy Van Horebeek (89) |
10 +2▲ | yenmimi | 21 points 1. Tim Gajser (243) 2. Clement Desalle (25) 3. Jeremy Van Horebeek (89) |
11 +1▲ | pat42 | 21 points 1. Tim Gajser (243) 2. Jeremy Van Horebeek (89) 3. Clement Desalle (25) |
12 +1▲ | LeChe35 | 21 points 1. Tim Gajser (243) 2. Clement Desalle (25) 3. Jeremy Van Horebeek (89) |
13 | NIOBE49 | 21 points 1. Tim Gajser (243) 2. Jeremy Van Horebeek (89) 3. Clement Desalle (25) |
14 +2▲ | Nistic | 21 points 1. Tim Gajser (243) 2. Jeremy Van Horebeek (89) 3. Clement Desalle (25) |
15 −1▼ | ptirossi24 | 21 points 1. Tim Gajser (243) 2. Jeremy Van Horebeek (89) 3. Clement Desalle (25) |
16 −1▼ | JMi | 21 points 1. Tim Gajser (243) 2. Jeremy Van Horebeek (89) 3. Clement Desalle (25) |
17 | Greg125 | 20 points 1. Tim Gajser (243) 2. Romain Febvre (461) 3. Maximilian Nagl (12) |
18 −1▼ | gbe05 | 20 points 1. Tim Gajser (243) 2. Romain Febvre (461) 3. Maximilian Nagl (12) |
19 | desmolo | 20 points 1. Tim Gajser (243) 2. Romain Febvre (461) 3. Maximilian Nagl (12) |
20 | pinkie | 20 points 1. Tim Gajser (243) 2. Romain Febvre (461) 3. Maximilian Nagl (12) |
21 −1▼ | nofoott50 | 20 points 1. Tim Gajser (243) 2. Romain Febvre (461) 3. Maximilian Nagl (12) |
22 +1▲ | cevennol | 20 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Tim Gajser (243) 3. Maximilian Nagl (12) |
23 −2▼ | Lav | 18 points 1. Jeremy Van Horebeek (89) 2. Tim Gajser (243) 3. Gautier Paulin (21) |
24 +1▲ | loris46 | 15 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Antonio Cairoli (222) 3. Clement Desalle (25) |
25 +1▲ | touf | 13 points 1. Jeremy Van Horebeek (89) 2. Clement Desalle (25) 3. Romain Febvre (461) |
26 +1▲ | dess72 | 12 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Antonio Cairoli (222) 3. Jordi Tixier (911) |
27 −4▼ | jujutoto | 11 points 1. Tim Gajser (243) 2. Romain Febvre (461) 3. Clement Desalle (25) |
28 | yannthomas | 11 points 1. Tim Gajser (243) 2. Romain Febvre (461) 3. Clement Desalle (25) |
29 −2▼ | Tm | 11 points 1. Tim Gajser (243) 2. Romain Febvre (461) 3. Clement Desalle (25) |
30 −4▼ | carat | 10 points 1. Tim Gajser (243) 2. Gautier Paulin (21) 3. Evgeny Bobryshev (777) |
💥 +1▲ | MaxBIAGGI3 | 8 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Tim Gajser (243) 3. Jordi Tixier (911) |
Ordre fonction du nombre de points marqués puis de l'ancienneté du pronostic.