Course disputée .
Le classement du week-end toutes compétitions confondues.
Rang | Joueur | Pronostic |
🥇 +5▲ | jmfournel | 52 points 1. Maximilian Nagl (5) 2. Antonio Cairoli (222) 3. Ken De Dycker (9) |
🥈 +4▲ | JMi | 52 points 1. Maximilian Nagl (5) 2. Antonio Cairoli (222) 3. Ken De Dycker (9) |
🥉 +1▲ | Rossi-41 | 42 points 1. David Philippaerts (19) 2. Antonio Cairoli (222) 3. Ken De Dycker (9) |
4 +3▲ | tofile | 41 points 1. Maximilian Nagl (5) 2. Antonio Cairoli (222) 3. Joshua Coppins (6) |
5 | pinkie | 39 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Maximilian Nagl (5) 3. Ken De Dycker (9) |
6 +1▲ | Taz83340 | 39 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Maximilian Nagl (5) 3. Ken De Dycker (9) |
7 +2▲ | dess72 | 37 points 1. Clement Desalle (25) 2. Antonio Cairoli (222) 3. Maximilian Nagl (5) |
8 +2▲ | carat | 36 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Ken De Dycker (9) 3. Maximilian Nagl (5) |
9 +1▲ | typhoon | 36 points 1. Ken De Dycker (9) 2. Maximilian Nagl (5) 3. Antonio Cairoli (222) |
10 +3▲ | tips | 36 points 1. Maximilian Nagl (5) 2. Ken De Dycker (9) 3. Joshua Coppins (6) |
11 | DuffBeer | 36 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Ken De Dycker (9) 3. Maximilian Nagl (5) |
12 +3▲ | benben75 | 36 points 1. Ken De Dycker (9) 2. Maximilian Nagl (5) 3. Antonio Cairoli (222) |
13 +4▲ | banditof | 36 points 1. Ken De Dycker (9) 2. Maximilian Nagl (5) 3. Antonio Cairoli (222) |
14 | Tm | 36 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Ken De Dycker (9) 3. Maximilian Nagl (5) |
15 +2▲ | norb02 | 35 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Clement Desalle (25) 3. Ken De Dycker (9) |
16 −1▼ | endurance | 34 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. David Philippaerts (19) 3. Maximilian Nagl (5) |
17 −1▼ | jasmine | 34 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. David Philippaerts (19) 3. Maximilian Nagl (5) |
18 +2▲ | 123ladouille | 34 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Maximilian Nagl (5) 3. David Philippaerts (19) |
19 +2▲ | xj600n | 34 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. David Philippaerts (19) 3. Maximilian Nagl (5) |
20 +3▲ | desmolo | 34 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Maximilian Nagl (5) 3. David Philippaerts (19) |
21 +1▲ | LeChe35 | 34 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Ken De Dycker (9) 3. David Philippaerts (19) |
22 +1▲ | crudy | 33 points 1. Ken De Dycker (9) 2. Antonio Cairoli (222) 3. Joshua Coppins (6) |
23 +2▲ | yannthomas | 32 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Maximilian Nagl (5) 3. Clement Desalle (25) |
24 +1▲ | gex68 | 31 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Joshua Coppins (6) 3. Ken De Dycker (9) |
25 | rostlud | 31 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Joshua Coppins (6) 3. Ken De Dycker (9) |
26 +5▲ | Le_Martien | 30 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Clement Desalle (25) 3. David Philippaerts (19) |
27 +3▲ | la-martienne | 30 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. David Philippaerts (19) 3. Clement Desalle (25) |
28 | funset | 30 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. David Philippaerts (19) 3. Clement Desalle (25) |
29 −1▼ | cevennol | 30 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. David Philippaerts (19) 3. Clement Desalle (25) |
30 −2▼ | cocomx | 30 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. David Philippaerts (19) 3. Clement Desalle (25) |
31 −1▼ | Mr_GIXER | 28 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Joshua Coppins (6) 3. Maximilian Nagl (5) |
32 −3▼ | joebar83 | 28 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Maximilian Nagl (5) 3. Joshua Coppins (6) |
33 −1▼ | MaxBIAGGI3 | 26 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. David Philippaerts (19) 3. Joshua Coppins (6) |
34 +1▲ | christianDR350 | 24 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Jonathan Barragan (7) 3. Maximilian Nagl (5) |
35 −6▼ | ppda | 24 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Joshua Coppins (6) 3. Clement Desalle (25) |
36 −1▼ | marmotte | 19 points 1. Joshua Coppins (6) 2. Jonathan Barragan (7) 3. Ken De Dycker (9) |
37 | cazin | 18 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Tanel Leok (8) 3. Sebastien Pourcel (90) |
38 −1▼ | rabroo | 12 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Jonathan Barragan (7) 3. Sebastien Pourcel (90) |
💥 −2▼ | monkey17 | 0 points 1. Kevin Wouts (75) 2. Rob Van Vijfeijken (56) 3. Billy Mackenzie (211) |
Ordre fonction du nombre de points marqués puis de l'ancienneté du pronostic.